This is a hint of the direction of a future backlash. People who use LLMs and other AI programs as collaborators and even as coworkers will be stigmatized and attacked by the easily-automated, in groups, because of the marginally less poor career prospects.
Learning the cognitive framings for working with AI to boost your own efficiency is moderately easy but it feels impossible to the uninformed. Some even deeply believe that lifelong learning is itself a hoax.
Efficiency comes from agency, vision and creativity, not typing speed. All three of these can be and are boosted by having a full time career coach on the phone in your pocket.
This is a hint of the direction of a future backlash. People who use LLMs and other AI programs as collaborators and even as coworkers will be stigmatized and attacked by the easily-automated, in groups, because of the marginally less poor career prospects.
Learning the cognitive framings for working with AI to boost your own efficiency is moderately easy but it feels impossible to the uninformed. Some even deeply believe that lifelong learning is itself a hoax.
Puhleeez, when will this efficiency boosting myth die?
Everyone who already knew code knew that efficiency in writing software does not come from typing speed, full stop.
Nobody wants to call out an employer on AI magical thinking in a tight job market though. You could lose your job.
Efficiency comes from agency, vision and creativity, not typing speed. All three of these can be and are boosted by having a full time career coach on the phone in your pocket.
Went in to pull the curtain back—ended up doing PR for the wizard.
[dead]
[dead]